By Michael Reagan with Michael R. Shannon
A surge in banker’s boxes has been observed at Louisiana State University (LSU) as recently dismissed officials begin vacating their offices ahead of a new employment opportunity. The upheaval commenced following the termination of LSU football Coach Brian Kelly, attributed to his team’s subpar performance in a state where football holds significant cultural weight.
The turnover intensified with the dismissal of LSU Athletic Director Scott Woodward, whose role in both firings has drawn scrutiny. Republican Governor Jeff Landry emerged as a central figure, leveraging his authority over Louisiana’s higher education system to influence university decisions. Landry initiated proceedings by convening a meeting at the governor’s mansion involving LSU administrators, board members, and donors, culminating in Kelly’s firing.
Subsequent tensions arose as Landry criticized Woodward for Kelly’s $53 million contract buyout, which became a focal point of contention. During a news conference, when asked about Woodward’s role in hiring the next coach, Landry responded, “Scott Woodward is not selecting the next coach. Hell, I’d let Donald Trump select him before I’d let him do it.” The remark sparked debate over his approach to university management.
Woodward reportedly began packing his office within days. Historical parallels were drawn to Governor Huey Long, who famously intervened in LSU affairs by coaching, negotiating with officials, and even co-writing the team’s fight song. Unlike Long, Landry’s involvement has been described as more restrained.
The article highlights a broader argument for red-state governors to assert greater influence over higher education, contrasting past hands-off policies with current efforts to reclaim control from what is perceived as left-leaning academic institutions. While specific actions by other governors like Ron DeSantis are mentioned, the focus remains on Landry’s direct engagement with LSU.
Michael Reagan and Michael R. Shannon, contributors to political commentary, present their perspectives on governance and education reform.
